Dramaturgie im zeitgenössischen Tanz ist ? positiv gemeint ? ein heißes Eisen. Idealerweise sind Dramaturginnen und Dramaturgen während der Erarbeitung eines Stücks die besten Freunde der Choreografen. more
Body art has been an Austrian speciality since the home-made splatter fests of the Viennese Actionists. But the overwhelming success of Erwin Wurm
comes as a welcome break from this trade in macabre gusto-gore. A man
of many talents, he exorcises their ritualistic, blasphemous sorcery
and poisons us to the secretions with which Schwarzkogler, Nitsch, Brus and Mühl chose to anoint their royal household. Wurm ushers in his brand of mocking enlightenment with nothing but a dry, closed body.
"The artist begging for mercy" (2002) c-print. © Erwin Wurm: VG BILD-KUNST
This
attack on the Viennese house gods has raised a few heckles. In hostile
studios, comments are dropped here and there that compared with the
Actionists, Wurm offers nothing but surface. Of course Wurm is
surface. He wants to be surface, but one so highly polished that it's
impossible to keep a firm footing. And as for the spleen of his fellow
artists, I can only refer to the Austrian cabaret artist Hans Peter Heinzl who said, "In Vienna, people even envy you your cancer."
Wurm,
in his precise and matter-of-fact turn of phrase, talks with glee about
this inexhaustible resource, the self-hatred of the artists and
intellectuals. It fuels his work, this envy complex, which
comes on tap in a city held tight in the grip of monarchy and church
for seven hundred years. So living abroad is out of the question. He is
as dependent on his heimat as Thomas Bernhard (more).
Wurm's equivalent to Berhard's indignation at the "arty dinner party"
in "Cutting Timber"/"Woodcutters" or – in "Old Masters" – of the
misanthropic brooding in front of the Tintoretto in the Bordone room at
the Kunsthistorische Museum, are his bizarre tableaux which, as in "Der
Landadel" (landed gentry), showcase the collapse of society.
In
this city, the artist appears to have found the place he was looking
for. On the ground floor of a building in Taborstraße in Vienna's 20th
district, the visitor is greeted by Palmer's Textile company which
promises "sensual items for day and night", Kreps Leather Goods, and
the Min Jiang shop advertising sweaters at knock-down prices. These are
the sort of shops where Erwin Wurm would find components for his work.
Or more precisely, it is in places like this that you will stumble
across many of the things that have found their way into his stagings
and photo works. Because Erwin Wurm prefers to use things that fall
into his hands. He likes to purge things of their utility value,
he says. Which is why he likes things, objects, materials that people
generally overlook, perishable fruit, stationery, brooms, bags or bits
of furniture. He would never go near luxury items. His alchemy relies
on the inconspicuous. Anything with material appeal, with the aura of
rarity and patina would only mar his ambush on banality. Which is why
it comes as little surprise that one of Wurm's portraits is of the
French author Frederic Beigbeder
whose novel "99 francs" exposes the true face of marketing with much
caustic cackling. The temporal sculptures which poke fun at functional
usage are there to point out the worm holes that are everywhere and in
everything.
"Leopoldstadt" (2004) c-print. © Erwin Wurm: VG BILD-KUNST
The artist tells me that the sweaters and bits of
clothing that he uses at specific moments in time should be replaced
regularly with contemporary items. This is to guarantee that they
retain the invisibility they would have had when they were first used.
Because, he says, his starting point is the overlooked. I point out that this is exactly what Duchamp prescribed for his Readymades. Duchamp told me that the bottle rack
and the other objects which he used at particular times should be
renewed and replaced at regular intervals. The triviality of a bottle
rack would, 50 years down the line – we were sitting in Duchamp's
apartment in Neuilly in 1965 – find its equivalent in a plastic bucket.
The bottle rack on the other hand, had become a curiosity, as the
function of this object which had once graced every wine cellar in
France had long since disappeared from common knowledge.
In
the spartan studio, which has all the tidiness and files of an
architect's office, it is almost impossible to imagine the quirky,
boundless wealth of imagination that runs riot in Wurm's head. Almost
everything we look at deals with twisting gestures, things and faces.
When I mention Karl Valentin, Wurm is pleased. He has a hilarious way of knocking people off balance, a la Magritte, stuffing an apple into the mouth of Pater Liborius (photo series)
in the Benedictine monastery of Admont – and in the process turning the
cleric into an Adam ready to choke on the very symbol of temptation.
"Fat convertible", 2005, mixed media.
Photo: Courtesy Galerie Xavier Hufkens, Brussels / Vincent Everharts © Erwin Wurm
France was one of the first places to get people excited about Wurm. A video (at YouTube) by the Red Hot Chilli Peppers
brought him widespread popularity. "Can't Stop" features the band
re-enacting all number of his screwball gags in series of hilarious
mini-takes. These alogical vignettes echo Christian Boltanski's "Saynetes comiques", Rebecca Horn's "Berlin. Übungen in Neun Stücken" (watch videos here) and Robert Longo's "Men in the Cities"
where his neighbours, like mannequins held on strings by some exterior
force, try out exalted poses on the studio roof. The fascination of
body language, which remains a foreign language, stretches from the
Surrealists back to the photographs that Charcot,
Freud's teacher, took of hysterics at the Salpetriere in Paris in the
late nineteenth century. Body as lapsus, we encounter it again with Bergson, in the sketches of Karl Valentin, and not least in Kafka's writing where the articulation of legs and arms drifts apart.
In "Rendez-vous des amis" Max Ernst
has Breton, Aragon, Eluard and friends resort to an imaginary sign
language to express things for which no language exists. Bodies and
things lose their graspable functions with Wurm. It's as if an endless second of shock
stands between wanting and moving. The artist does not proceed
spontaneously. The countless philosophical references in his scribbled
notes and installations summon us to inspect his work for precise
influences. There is no overlooking the relationship to Descartes' mechanistic perception of the body, not to mention La Mettrie's treatise "L'homme-machine". Every gesture is dependent on the will.
"One minute sculpture" (1997) c-print. Sammlung/Collection Centre Pompidou, Paris © Erwin Wurm: VG BILD-KUNST
The
principle is simple: Wurm loves a paradox, he turns everything on its
head. He turns trousers into waste-containers or minimalist sculptures.
The friends and models who appear before the camera are fitted with
prosthetics. Pencils and fountain pens spill out of nostrils,
mouths and ears. Pullovers of every colour and pattern hang on the
wall. Animal-hide bellows spring to mind, as does the flayed skin of Marsyas.
Wurm issues precise instructions for displaying the pullovers. They
play on recent art history which Wurm, like he says, knows very well.
And it's always good to meet an artist who doesn't insist on being the
first and only person to take a particular path, but instead allows
tradition into his work with a wink.
The well-versed Wurm knows
perfectly well that this game with textiles and craft is not new, as a
short-term memory might have one believe. Oldenburg, Morris, Beuys and Trockel all
tried their hand at these techniques. Dada, Arp, Taeuber, Piacabia took
recourse to this pin-pricking practice to undermine the Avantgarde. Did
Max Ernst not call himself "Max Ernst tricoteur" in the Dada years in
Cologne?
Wurm begins with Dada, with the early Dada collages, based on knitting and crocheting
patterns. For this reason everything in his work that one might want to
explain formally, that looks like Arte povera or Minimalism, recedes
into the background. What he's after are interesting associations, the
concave form into which the pullover is folded is an intentional echo
of the first Readymade, the pissoir with which Duchamp taxed the taste
and critical facilities of the jury in 1917. In a series of photographs
we see clothes put on wrong. Bodies distort sweaters and suits into bizarre cephalopods.
Straight-jackets spring to mind, as do the extravagant gymnastics of
the Dadaists and the Surrealists playing with prosthetics and ectoplasm
and extraterritorial corporeality. Bodies and gestures step over the
borders of respectability. As Max Ernst, Picasso, Miro, Hans Bellmer, Claude Cahun and Bunuel demonstrated.
"The Artist who swallowed the World, when it was still a Disc" and "Fat House" Photo: Rastl/Deinhardstein/ MUMOK © Erwin Wurm
In contrast to all this extravagance Wurm offers us pure irrelevance.
This is important for the effect, to make people laugh. Because
extravagance yields less readily to the ridiculousness into which Wurm
wants to pull the world around him. This also explains why he was so
quick to quash his early enthusiasm for Viennese Fantastic Realism. In the photo series and in the videos, we see a man, Fabio Zolly, on a one-way textile street swelling into a Russian doll.
He puts on one set of clothes over the next. The result makes one think
of "Übergewicht, unwichtig: Unform" (overweight, unimportant: unform),
which was the title of a theatre piece by Werner Schwab, the friend who was so influential for Wurm in the old days in Graz.
But
there are other associations. Talking to Wurm it becomes clear that
this compulsion to wear and carry everything one owns can also be read
as a reference to migration and homelessness. This zest for all things
obese comes to a head in the spherical figure "The artist who swallowed
the world". Like an exorbitant marzipan Mozartkugel
it nears the compressed planet "Adorno as Oliver Hardy". Just like in
"Bohemian Girl" where Laurel and Hardy are stretched and flattened,
this is all about burlesque distortions of images of the body. Wurm has
created an alphabet of elite bodily contortions. With the Uri Geller touch,
he bends everything, simulating the curvature of the world. He presents
an orange VW bus, twisted apparently by the telekinetic powers of the
Indian guru Mahesh Abayahani. The claim is at least as credible as Yves
Klein's famous leap into the void, or Beuys' four-day isolation with a wild coyote.
"Telekintetically bent VW-Van" (2006) © Erwin Wurm: VG BILD-KUNST, Bonn 2007
Wurm
presents his absurd operations, and this goes for the fat house or the
Porsche, with perplexing confidence. Nothing he shows strays far from
the linguistic convulsions so beloved by his friend Schwab who died
young. Because as scintillating and engaging as the visual aspects of
Wurm's works are, we sense that these all suggestions refer back to a linguistic Baroque, a play with syllogisms. One thinks of the 'Parolde in liberta' of the Futurists,
which did away with syntax and logical connections. Wurm finds images
for grotesque figures of speech whose variations are systematically
played out in the writing of Elfriede Jelinek, Bernhard, Ernst Jandl (hear poems) or Friederike Mayröcker.
The artist encourages us to join in. He provides his audience with the
basic equipment and instructions so that they might re-enact the quirky
scenes. The effect thrives on participation. It is the challenge to
imitate the grimacing character heads of Franz Xaver Messerschmidt or
pathological distortions, to make a fool of oneself, that
differentiates his from Beuys' approach who clearly had a strong
influence on Wurm. Unlike Wurm, Beuys always remains his own officiant.
He allows no one to enter the chancel. The props which Beuys left
behind after his performances were certainly not intended to encourage
participation. Beuys the artist signed, so to speak, in his absence. He
leaves behind discarded props, orphan objects.
Wurm's
experiments on himself, which make the self-evident squint, that smudge
logic and sense, are amusing and thought-provoking at once. Because the
gags and the "One Minute Sculptures"
lead to the madhouse of society's behaviour. What would be more fitting
in Vienna than to fade into all this clowning about the knowledge about
Breughel's "Kinderspiele"
in the Kunsthistorische Museum. Erwin's stagings are a catalogue of
bodily lack of discipline, of alienation, ticks and spleen. He
brandishes it like a contemporary biblia pauperum against the blunt
illiteracy of his and our time.
*
Werner Spies (born
1937) was a professor of 20th century art at the Dusseldorf
Kunstakademie. From 1997 to 2000 he was the director of the Musee
National d'Art Modern at the Centre Pompidou. He has organised numerous
exhibitions in Paris, Dusseldorf, Stuttgart, Tübingen, Tokyo and
Berlin. He is a member of the Deutsche Akademie für Sprache and
Dichtung and is a member of the French legion of honour.
This article originally appeared in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on February 24, 2007.
The Erwin Wurm retrospective at the Deichtorhallen in Hamburg runs until 2 September, 2007.
Translation: lp