Dramaturgie im zeitgenössischen Tanz ist ? positiv gemeint ? ein heißes Eisen. Idealerweise sind Dramaturginnen und Dramaturgen während der Erarbeitung eines Stücks die besten Freunde der Choreografen.
more
Der Standard: In recent years, the EU has let it be known it
has plans to create outposts for African refugees in North Africa.
Haven't these outposts existed for a long time now?
Paulo Moura: Yes, as informal camps. In general, the refugees see it as their right to
solve the problem as they see fit. What is certain is that they want to
come to Europe, and there is nothing that can change their minds. They live to reach Europe.
So it wouldn't be a good idea to set up such camps. The last time I was
in one of these "underground camps" in a forest near Ceuta, a refugee
leader said that the official outposts wouldn't change the refugees'
condition one bit. The money would be used for the local people of the
country in question. "Official" camps only serve to give
Europeans a clear conscience.
Paolo Moura. Courtesy Christa Hager
Morocco receives financial aid
from the EU. What impact does this have? Are institutions in place that
supervise this money flow?
The country receives money to
solve problems where they occur. But the way this is done is
unacceptable. Prison conditions are miserable, and the jails are filled to overflowing. Thousands of people continue to live and die in the forests and deserts, and nothing is done to stop it. And the system of corruption in Morocco pervades every level – from the government to the police to the military. So it's impossible to exercise control.
The refugees' situation hasn't changed for the past three years?
That's
right. But the migrants have changed their locations and tactics, and
continue to do so. The first time I went to Missnana forest, there were
3,000 refugees living there. Now they've all left and found new hiding places.
It was too dangerous there because the police kept coming in and
killing people. One of the new hiding places is near Ceuta. Many also
flee to the south, as far as the West Sahara, and try to make it from
there to Fuerteventura, although the ocean is even more dangerous there.
How many migrants manage to make it to Europe?
The
numbers are vague. We know that every year several thousand people make
it to Spain, and that several thousand die each year. There's a fifty-fifty chance of making it to Europe alive.
Are there no relief organisations there to help them?
By
and large the people get no help at all. People die there on a daily
basis. Many are very sick, especially in winter. They have no tents and
no warm clothes. But the last time I was near Ceuta I saw that there
were some doctors from Medecins Sans Frontieres there to help.
The problem is that organisations need authorisation from the Moroccan
government to work there. And they don't get it because the government
doesn't acknowledge that there are refugees in the forests. So as a
rule they don't permit relief organisations. For the
organisations this is a very difficult situation: if they want to stay,
they have to negotiate with the government. And if they do that, they're hardly in a position to apply pressure.
How does the Moroccan population get along with the black African refugees?
On
the one hand, some help the refugees with money or food. But on the
other hand, many take advantage of their situation. At first some
Moroccans saw the refugees as a means of getting rich, and rented out their houses and rooms. Then when things got worse in Tangiers with police controls and the danger of deportation, the refugees went to hide in the forest. There they were increasingly attacked by bandits who murdered them, raped their wives, stole their cell phones and the money they'd saved up for the journey.
Life in the forest is very dangerous for the refugees, not just because
of the police. There's also a lot of distrust. The black Africans are
often chained hand and foot on the boats to make sure no one
moves – for fear they could rock it. If the boat sinks, they go down
with it. Moroccans by contrast can move around freely.
Can the violence of the police and other elements be explained by the migrants' illegal status, or does racism also play a role?
The
relationship of the police to the Moroccans has changed. Now informal
crimes like drug trafficking and human smuggling are attacked with
greater vigilance. This creates racism among the people, because the migrants are blamed
for the situation. The police and the authorities also accuse the black
Africans of harming Morocco's image. They aren't wanted, they say, and
the police has to be informed when a black person is seen on the street. This is also one reason why the refugees hide in the forests.
Despite many failed attempts, most refugees keep on trying to get to Europe. How do they hold out?
Some
live for five years or more in hideouts, many of them are deported
after being arrested by the police. Some go to the desert, a no-man's land
near Algeria, then go hundreds of kilometres on foot to the coast. Or
once they get to Europe, they're deported back to their country of
origin and then the whole process starts all over again.
Religion plays a major role in all this, and helps them put up with it.
Their pastors have a big influence, especially from the Protestant
"Pentecostal Church". They give the refugees practical tips and offer
them their help. The pastors also encourage people to emigrate to
Europe. Their religion is heavily based on the promise of well-being
and the will of God that humans should actively pursue riches in the here-and-now.
Isn't there something else behind the religious "motive"?
Most
of the migrants are from Nigeria. In countries like that there's no
hope, not only because of poverty. Nigeria is a very rich country, but
there's no way to rise in the social hierarchy, to find work or earn enough money. The only way out is escape. The
people who try to come to Europe are not the poorest. They have some
money, in contrast to the very poor, those who stay put. Some families
sell their houses to pay the Mafia to bring one of their
children to Europe. Women are especially prone to signing the sort of
agreement which guarantees their arrival in Europe. In exchange, they
have to pay back 40,000 dollars, which means they are for all intents
and purposes slaves. Voodoo rituals and threats against these
families make sure that most of them, for the most part very young
women, don't renege on these contracts. They're not told they'll have
to work as prostitutes. They think they can earn the money as
waitresses or hairdressers, or go to university. Another strategy of
the Mafia is to get the girls pregnant. If the child is born in Spain,
they can remain there for six months. Many Catholic priests in
Spain know about this and help by providing the girls with a place to
stay, and by looking after the children. They want to help, but they're
part of the system.
What do these contracts mean for the girls who are still in Morocco?
Life
in the forest is hierarchically structured, and there's a fully
developed power structure. There are leaders who either receive or steal money,
food and clothing from the others. The powerful ones often also have
contacts with the Moroccan Mafia or police. All the women live within
this system, and are taken care of by the men. Each girl has a
"husband" who looks after her. Some of these are rewarded by the Mafia
and get to come to Europe. Women are the biggest profit makers for
the Mafia, especially the pretty ones. The ugly ones get left behind.
Many of them end up having babies, spend their time waiting and waiting
and never make it out of the forest.
Is human tragedy a
fitting subject for art? Your reportages and stories make powerful use
of aesthetic means. What are you trying to accomplish, especially as
far as the reality is concerned?
So much information is available, but in fact people know so little.
Most of it they couldn't care less about. How information is
transmitted in the media today doesn't change the way people react to
it. "30 die in Irak" – and then you go back to work as if nothing had
happened. Information often serves to appease people's consciences:
"I'm informed. But I've got nothing to do with these people."
Journalism should change the way things are. To do that, I've chosen the
literary route, to present things in a deeper way and prevent a black
and white paint job of reality, which is not so simple. It's at least
as profound and complex as a novel.
*
The interview originally appeared in German in Der Standard on October 6, 2005.
Christa Hager is a journalist with Der Standard.
Translation: jab.
RSS
Twitter
Why the Russian youth have tolerated the political situation in their country for so long and why they are no longer tolerant. The poet Natalia Klyuchareva explains the background to the protests on Bolotnaya Square in Moscow on December 10th. Image: Leonid Faerberg
Filmmaker and theatre director Andres Veiel disagrees with the parallels currently being drawn between left-wing and right-wing violence in Germany. The RAF is the wrong model for the Zwickau neo-Nazi group, the so-called "Brown Army Faction" responsible for a series of murders of Turkish small business owners. Unlike the RAF, this group never publicly claimed responsibility for their crimes. Veiel is emphatic - you have to look at the biographies of the perpetrators. An interview with Heike Karen Runge.
Germany has been rocked by the disclosures surrounding the series of neo-Nazi murders of Turkish citizens. In the wake of these events, Former GDR dissident Freya Klier calls for an honest look at the xenophobia cultivated by the policies of the former East Germany, where the core of the so-called "Brown Army Faction" was based. And demands that East Germans finally confront a long-denied past. (Photo: © Nadja Klier)
In response to the arson attack on the offices of the Parisian satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on November 2, Danish critic and semiotician Frederik Stjernfelt is nauseated by the opinions voiced against the publication, especially in the British and American media. Why don't they see that Islamism is right-wing extremism?
Activist and author, Andri Snaer Magnason is among the Icelandic guests of honor at this year's Frankfurt Book Fair. His book and film "Dreamland" is both an ecological call to action and a polemic. "The politicians took one of the most beautiful parts of Iceland and offered it to unscrupulous companies," says the author in a critique of his native country. By Daniela Zinser 
In their book "Lügendes Licht" (lying light) Thomas Worm and Claudia Karstedt explore the darker side of the EU ban on incandescent bulbs. From disposal issues to energy efficiency, the low-energy bulb is not necessarily a beacon of a greener future. By Brigitte Werneburg
The malice of the American media in the case of Dominique Strauss-Kahn is a symptom of sexual uptightness that borders on the sinister, and the feminists have joined forces with the religious Right to see it through. We can learn much from America, but not when it comes to the art of love. By Pascal Bruckner
Published a year ago, the controversial book "Deutschland schafft sich ab" (Germany is doing away with itself) by former banker and Berlin Finance Senator Thilo Sarrazin sparked intense discussion. Hamed Abdel-Samad asks: what has the Sarrazin debate achieved beyond polarisation and insult? And how can Germany avoid cultivating its own classes of "future foreigners"?
A Dutch action group for free will wants to give all people the right to assisted suicide. But can this be achieved without us ending up somewhere we never wanted to go? Gerbert van Loenen has grave doubts.